4.6 Article

Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: Is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard?

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 281-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.050

Keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; bleaching; consumer safety; melanotoxicity; mercury; mercury toxicity; skin lightening; skin whitening; whitening cream; x-ray fluorescence spectrometry

Categories

Funding

  1. SmartPractice
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cosmetic skin lightening is practiced worldwide. Mercury is a well-documented melanotoxin added to some lightening products. However, mercury can cause many dermatologic, renal, and neurologic problems. The Food and Drug Administration limits the amount of mercury in cosmetic products to trace amounts, 1 ppm. Objective: The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate a large international sample of lightening products for mercury content, focusing on products available to US consumers either online or in stores. Methods: A total of 549 skin-lightening products, manufactured in 32 countries, were purchased online in the United States, Taiwan, and Japan and in stores in the United States, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, and Sri Lanka. Cosmetics were screened for mercury content above 200 ppm using a low-cost portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Results: Of the 549 tested products, 6.0% (n = 33) contained mercury above 1000 ppm. In all, 45% of mercury-containing samples contained mercury in excess of 10,000 ppm. Of lightening products purchased in the United States, 3.3% were found to contain mercury in excess of 1000 ppm. Limitations: Our study did not evaluate creams for other melanosuppressive ingredients. Only 1 sample of each product was tested. Conclusion: Our study confirms the national and global presence of mercury in skin-lightening products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available