4.6 Review

Intralesional agents in the management of cutaneous malignancy: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 413-422

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.12.013

Keywords

basal cell carcinoma; bleomycin; cutaneous lymphoma; 5-fluorouracil; injection; interferon; intralesional agents; keratoacanthoma; melanoma; methotrexate; rose bengal; squamous cell carcinoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intralesional agents have a role in the management of cutaneous malignancies. In this article, the efficacy, side effects, strengths, limitations, costs, and practical considerations regarding the use of intralesional agents to treat basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, selected cutaneous lymphomas, and even metastatic melanoma are reviewed. Intralesional administration of 5-fluorouracil, interferon, interleukin-2, bleomycin with electrochemotherapy, and aminolevulinic acid with photodynamic therapy are discussed as treatment modalities in basal cell carcinoma. Interferon (similar to 1.5 M IU, 3 times weekly X 3 weeks) is perhaps the most widely Used regimen for basal cell carcinoma. With regard to squamous cell carcinoma, treatment with 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, interferon, and Neomycin are reviewed. Methotrexate (similar to 0.3-2.0 mL of 12.5 or 25 mg/mL, two injections similar to 2 weeks apart) was perhaps the most widely used agent. Interferon (3 M IU X 3 times weekly for similar to 8.5 weeks) and rituximab (10-30 mg per lesion, 3 times weekly for 1 week, possibly repeated 4 weeks later) are sometimes used in the management of primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas, whereas in primary cutaneous CD30(+) lymphoma intralesional methotrexate (0.4-0.5 mL of 50 mg/mL weekly for 2 weeks) has been used. Finally, the roles of BCG vaccine, cidofovir, rose bengal, and Neomycin with electrochemotherapy for the palliation of metastatic melanoma are reviewed. Intralesional management appears most useful when surgical intervention is not a viable option, for cases in which the cosmetic outcome may be superior, or for situations in which the side effects from systemic chemotherapeutic agents are to be minimized. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:413-22.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available