4.5 Article

A New Parenting-Based Group Intervention for Young Anxious Children: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.12.015

Keywords

anxiety; parenting; randomized controlled trial

Funding

  1. MRC [G108/604]
  2. MRC [G108/604] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G108/604] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite recent advances, there are still no interventions that have been developed for the specific treatment of young children who have anxiety disorders. This study examined the impact of a new, cognitive-behaviorally based parenting intervention on anxiety symptoms. Method: Families of 74 anxious children (aged 9 years or less) took part in a randomized controlled trial, which compared the new 10-session, group-format intervention with a wait-list control condition. Outcome measures included blinded diagnostic interview and self-reports from parents and children. Results: Intention-to-treat analyses indicated that children whose parent(s) received the intervention were significantly less anxious at the end of the study than those in the control condition. Specifically, 57% of those receiving the new intervention were free of their primary disorder, compared with 15% in the control condition. Moreover, 32% of treated children were free of any anxiety diagnosis at the end of the treatment period, compared with 6% of those in the control group. Treatment gains were maintained at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: This new parenting-based intervention may represent an advance in the treatment of this previously neglected group. Clinical trial registration information: Anxiety in Young Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a New Cognitive-Behaviourally Based Parenting Intervention; http://www.isrctn.orgi; ISRCTN12166762. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2011;50(3):242-251.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available