4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Father-child transmission of antisocial behavior: The moderating role of father's presence in the home

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181642979

Keywords

father; antisocial; twin study; interaction; parent-child transmission

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [AA 09367] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA 05147] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To demonstrate an environmental effect of being raised by an antisocial father and to test whether the transmission of antisocial behavior from father to child is moderated by the father's presence in the home. Method: A community sample of male and female 11- and 17-year-old twins and their biological parents participating in the Minnesota Twin Family Study was used. A series of hierarchical linear regression models was used to examine the relationship between father antisociality and his children's externalizing psychopathology and to determine whether the father's time spent in the home moderated this relationship. Models controlled for the child's sex. Results: A significant main effect of both father's antisociality and father's presence on the children's externalizing psychopathology was found: Children born to antisocial fathers evidenced higher rates of externalizing behavior, and children raised without their biological father in the home exhibited more externalizing behaviors. The interaction was also significant such that the association between father and child antisociality was stronger when the father was present for a longer period of the child's life. Furthermore, when fathers show high levels of antisociality, fathers' presence appears to have deleterious rather than beneficial effects on child behavior. Conclusions: The present results suggest the transmission of antisociality from father to child is at least partially environmentally moderated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available