Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 904-917Publisher
AMER ACAD AUDIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.25.9.11
Keywords
Auditory processing disorder; clinical entity; nosography; speech recognition-in-noise disorder; Sydenham-Guttentag criteria
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The area of (central) auditory processing disorder [(C)APD] is highly controversial. This controversy is fueled in part by multiple ambiguous descriptions of this condition. The American Speech-Language and Hearing Association and the American Academy of Audiology state that (C)APD is a clinical entity, but other sources say that this is questionable. The clinical entity is a concept used to define the nature of a disorder in order to facilitate diagnosis and intervention. Nosography is the study of the systematic description of diseases and disorders. The work in the field of nosography by physicians Thomas Sydenham and Otto Guttentag is reviewed. Purpose: The Sydenham-Guttentag criteria for the clinical entity are presented as a framework for the conceptualization of disorders in the field of audiology. This paper discusses central auditory processing and speech recognition-in-noise disorders in reference to these criteria.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available