4.5 Article

The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages 2201-2212

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.3552866

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Key features of the voice-fundamental frequency (F-0) and formant frequencies (Fn)-can vary extensively among individuals. Some of this variation might cue fitness-related, biosocial dimensions of speakers. Three experiments tested the independent, joint and relative effects of F-0 and Fn on listeners' assessments of the body size, masculinity (or femininity), and attractiveness of male and female speakers. Experiment 1 replicated previous findings concerning the joint and independent effects of F-0 and Fn on these assessments. Experiment 2 established frequency discrimination thresholds (or just-noticeable differences, JND's) for both vocal features to use in subsequent tests of their relative salience. JND's for F-0 and Fn were consistent in the range of 5%-6% for each sex. Experiment 3 put the two voice features in conflict by equally discriminable amounts and found that listeners consistently tracked Fn over F-0 in rating all three dimensions. Several non-exclusive possibilities for this outcome are considered, including that voice Fn provides more reliable cues to one or more dimensions and that listeners' assessments of the different dimensions are partially interdependent. Results highlight the value of first establishing JND's for discrimination of specific features of natural voices in future work examining their effects on voice-based social judgments. (C) 2011 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI:10.1121/1.3552866]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available