4.5 Article

Inter-patient variability of platelet reactivity in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor

Journal

PLATELETS
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 373-377

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2015.1095874

Keywords

Platelet aggregation; prasugrel; ticagrelor; therapeutic window; variability

Funding

  1. Roche
  2. Austrian Society of Cardiology
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Daiichi Sankyo
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. BMS/Sanofi Aventis
  7. Eli Lilly-Daiichi Sankyo
  8. AOPOrphan Pharmaceuticals
  9. Actelion
  10. Bayer
  11. Astra-Zeneca
  12. Servier
  13. Cordis
  14. Medtronic
  15. GSK
  16. Novartis
  17. Pfizer
  18. United Therapeutics
  19. Menarini
  20. Astra Zeneca
  21. Abbott
  22. Biotronik
  23. Amacord
  24. Edwards

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of platelet reactivity values in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor. This prospective observational study enrolled 200 patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Platelet aggregation was determined by multiple electrode aggregometry after stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in the maintenance phase of treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Only 3% of patients in the prasugrel group and 2% of study participants in the ticagrelor group had high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). The majority of patients displayed low on treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR; prasugrel: 69%; ticagrelor: 64%). The pharmacodynamic effect was similar in patients treated with prasugrel and ticagrelor: the median level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was 15U (interquartile range IQR 9-21U) under prasugrel treatment and 17U (IQR 8-24U) under ticagrelor treatment (p=0.370). In conclusion, our study suggests that there is some degree of variability in ADP-induced platelet aggregation under treatment with prasugrel and ticagrelor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available