4.5 Article

Association of platelet activation markers with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Journal

PLATELETS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 80-85

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2015.1041901

Keywords

Cancer; platelet activation; platelets; risk prediction; venous thromboembolism

Funding

  1. Anniversary Fund of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank [14744]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in cancer patients. Platelet activation is thought to be involved in cancer-associated VTE. Here, we determined the association between evolving markers of platelet activation (soluble P-selectin [sP-selectin], soluble CD40 ligand [sCD40L], thrombospondin-1 [TSP-1] and platelet factor-4 [PF-4]) and the development of cancer-associated VTE. A nested matched case-control study was applied within a cohort of 1779 patients with different types of cancer that had been included in the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS), a prospective, observational study on patients with newly diagnosed or progressive cancer after remission. Primary endpoint is symptomatic VTE during a maximum follow-up of 2 years. Cases (patients who developed VTE during follow-up) were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls without VTE during follow-up with respect to tumor type, stage and time of observation in the study. In total, 131 VTE cases were compared to 262 controls. In logistic regression analysis, only sP-selectin was associated with risk of VTE. The odds ratios (OR) per double increase of sP-selectin, sCD40L, TSP-1 and PF-4 were 1.66 (95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.35, p=0.005), 1.04 (0.89-1.21, p=0.635), 1.09 (0.90-1.32, p=0.360) and 1.03 (0.87-1.21, p=0.737), respectively. In conclusion, sP-selectin, but not sCD40L, TSP-1 or PF-4 were associated with risk of VTE in cancer patients in this nested case-control study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available