4.5 Article

Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages 792-805

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.3158835

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCD [R01 DC006014]
  2. Bloedel Hearing Research Foundation
  3. UK Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The choice of processing parameters for vocoded signals may have an important effect on the availability of various auditory features. Experiment I varied envelope cutoff frequency (30 and 300 Hz), carrier type (sine and noise), and number of bands (2-5) for vocoded speech presented to normal-hearing listeners. Performance was better with a high cutoff for sine-vocoding, with no effect of cutoff for noise-vocoding. With a low cutoff, performance was better for noise-vocoding than for sine-vocoding. With a high cutoff, performance was better for sine-vocoding. Experiment 2 measured perceptibility of cues to voice pitch variations. A noise carrier combined with a high cutoff allowed intonation to be perceived to some degree but performance was best in high-cutoff sine conditions. A low cutoff led to poorest performance, regardless of carrier. Experiment 3 tested the relative contributions of comodulation across bands and spectral density to improved performance with a sine carrier and high cutoff. Comodulation across bands had no effect so it appears that sidebands providing a denser spectrum improved performance. These results indicate that carrier type in combination with envelope cutoff can alter the available cues in vocoded speech, factors which must be considered in interpreting results with vocoded signals. (C) 2009 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3158835]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available