4.5 Article

On Lattices, Learning with Errors, Random Linear Codes, and Cryptography

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACM
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/1568318.1568324

Keywords

Algorithms; Theory; Lattice; cryptography; quantum computation; public key encryption; average-case hardness

Funding

  1. Alon Fellowship
  2. Binational Science Foundation
  3. Israel Science Foundation
  4. Army Research Office [DAAD19-03-1-0082]
  5. IST directorate [015848]
  6. European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our main result is a reduction from worst-case lattice problems such as GAPSVP and SIVP to a certain learning problem. This learning problem is a natural extension of the learning from parity with error problem to higher moduli. It can also be viewed as the problem of decoding from a random linear code. This, we believe, gives a strong indication that these problems are hard. Our reduction, however, is quantum. Hence, an efficient solution to the learning problem implies a quantum algorithm for GAPSVP and SIVP. A main open question is whether this reduction can be made classical (i.e., nonquantum). We also present a (classical) public-key cryptosystem whose security is based on the hardness of the learning problem. By the main result, its security is also based on the worst-case quantum hardness of GAPSVP and SIVP. The new cryptosystem is much more efficient than previous lattice-based cryptosystems: the public key is of size (O) over tilde (n(2)) and encrypting a message increases its size by a factor of (O) over tilde (n) (in previous cryptosystems these values are (O) over tilde (n(4)) and (O) over tilde (n(2)), respectively). In fact, under the assumption that all parties share a random bit string of length (O) over tilde (n(2)), the size of the public key can be reduced to (O) over tilde (n).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available