4.2 Article

Synthesis and fading of eighteenth-century Prussian blue pigments: a combined study by spectroscopic and diffractive techniques using laboratory and synchrotron radiation sources

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 460-473

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1107/S0909049513004585

Keywords

iron(III) hexacyanoferrate(II); archaeometry; pair distribution function; light exposure fading; paint layers

Funding

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique of Belgium [9.456595, 1.5.064.05, FC 78482]
  2. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prussian blue, a hydrated iron(III) hexacyanoferrate(II) complex, is a synthetic pigment discovered in Berlin in 1704. Because of both its highly intense color and its low cost, Prussian blue was widely used as a pigment in paintings until the 1970s. The early preparative methods were rapidly recognized as a contributory factor in the fading of the pigment, a fading already known by the mid-eighteenth century. Herein two typical eighteenth-century empirical recipes have been reproduced and the resulting pigment analyzed to better understand the reasons for this fading. X-ray absorption and Mossbauer spectroscopy indicated that the early syntheses lead to Prussian blue together with variable amounts of an undesirable iron(III) product. Pair distribution functional analysis confirmed the presence of nanocrystalline ferrihydrite, Fe10O14(OH)(2), and also identified the presence of alumina hydrate, Al10O14(OH)(2), with a particle size of similar to 15 angstrom. Paint layers prepared from these pigments subjected to accelerated light exposure showed a tendency to turn green, a tendency that was often reported in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century books. The presence of particles of hydrous iron(III) oxides was also observed in a genuine eighteenth-century Prussian blue sample obtained from a polychrome sculpture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available