4.6 Article

Electric field measurements in a dielectric barrier nanosecond pulse discharge with sub-nanosecond time resolution

Journal

PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0963-0252/24/3/035010

Keywords

four-wave mixing; electric field; nanosecond pulse discharge; kinetic modeling

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy Plasma Science Center 'Predictive Control of Plasma Kinetics: Multi-Phase and Bounded Systems'
  2. US DOE NNSA 'Center for Exascale Simulation of Plasma-Coupled Combustion'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents the results of time-resolved electric field measurements in a nanosecond discharge between two plane electrodes covered by dielectric plates, using picosecond four-wave mixing diagnostics. For absolute calibration, the IR signal was measured in hydrogen at a pressure of 440 Torr, for electrostatic electric field ranging from 0 to 8 kV cm(-1). The calibration curve (i.e. the square root of IR signal intensity versus electric field) was shown to be linear. By measuring the intensities of the pump, Stokes, and IR signal beam for each laser shot during the time sweep across the high-voltage pulse, temporal evolution of the electric field in the nanosecond pulse discharge was determined with sub-nanosecond time resolution. The results are compared to kinetic modeling predictions, showing good agreement, including non-zero electric field offset before the main high voltage pulse, breakdown moment, and reduction of electric field in the plasma after breakdown. The difference between the experimental results and model predictions is likely due to non-1D structure of the discharge. Comparison with the kinetic modeling predictions shows that electric field in the nanosecond pulse discharge is controlled primarily by electron impact excitation and charge accumulation on the dielectric surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available