4.5 Article

Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer with signet ring cell histology and their impact on the surgical strategy: analysis of single institutional experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 191, Issue 1, Pages 130-133

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.065

Keywords

Early gastric cancer; Signet ring cell carcinoma; Lymph node metastasis; Endoscopic treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The prognosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) with signet ring cell histology is more favorable than other undifferentiated gastric adenocarcinomas. An accurate assessment of potential lymph node metastasis is important for the appropriate treatment of EGC with signet ring cell histology. Therefore, this study analyzed the predictive factors associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with this type of EGC. Methods: A total of 136 EGC with signet ring cell histology patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy were reviewed in this study. The clinicopathologic features were analyzed to identify predictive factors for lymph node metastasis. Results: The overall rate of lymph node metastasis in EGC with signet ring cell histology was 10.3%. Using a univariate analysis, the risk factors for lymph node metastasis were identified as the tumor size, depth of tumor invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. The multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size >2 cm, submucosal invasion, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The risk of lymph node metastasis of EGC with signet ring cell histology was high in those with tumor sizes >= 2 cm, submucosal tumors, and lymphovascular invasion. A minimally invasive treatment, such as endoscopic resection, might be possible in highly selective cases of EGC with signet ring cell histology with intramucosal invasion, tumor size <2 cm, and no lymphovascular invasion. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available