4.5 Article

The Role of 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 Receptors in the Adaptive Mechanism of Colonic Transit Following the Parasympathetic Denervation in Rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages 510-516

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.002

Keywords

5-HT3 receptor; 5-HT4 receptor; colon; parasympathetic; denervation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [RO1 DK62768]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Clinical studies show that disturbed colonic motility induced by extrinsic nerves damage is restored over time. We studied whether 5-HT3 and 5HT(4) receptors are involved in mediating the adaptive mechanisms following parasympathetic denervation. Methods. Parasympathetic denervation of the entire colon was achieved by bilateral pelvic nerve transection and truncal vagotomy in rats. Colonic transit was measured by calculating the geometric center (GC) of Cr-51 distribution. Expression of 5-HT3 and 5HT(4) receptor mRNA was determined by real time RT-PCR. Results. Parasympathetic denervation caused a significant delay in colonic transit (GC = 4.36) at postoperative day (POD) 1, compared with sham operation (GC = 6.31). Delayed transit was gradually restored by POD 7 (GC = 5.99) after the denervation. Restored colonic transit was antagonized by the administration of 5-HT3 and 5HT(4) receptors antagonists at POD 7. 5-HT3 and 5HT(4) receptors mRNA expression were significantly increased in the mucosal/submucosal layer at POD 3 or POD 7, whereas no significant difference was observed in the longitudinal muscle layers adherent with the myenteric plexus (LMMP). Conclusions. It is suggested that up-regulation of 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors expression in the mucosal/submucosal layer is involved to restore the delayed transit after the parasympathetic denervation in rats. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available