4.5 Article

The American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Evaluation of HIPEC with Mitomycin C Versus Oxaliplatin in 539 Patients with Colon Cancer Undergoing a Complete Cytoreductive Surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages 779-785

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23728

Keywords

hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); cytoreductive surgery; colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundCytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are gaining acceptance as treatment for selected patients with colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRCPC). Tremendous variations exist in the HIPEC delivery. MethodsThe American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (ASPSM) examined the overall survival in patients with CRCPC who underwent a complete cytoreduction and HIPEC with Oxaliplatin vs. Mitomycin C (MMC), stratifying them by the Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS). ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) of 539 patients with complete cytoreduction was 32.6 months, 32.7 months for the MMC group and 31.4 months for the Oxaliplatin group (P=0.925). However, when stratified by PSDSS, median OS rates in PSDSS I/II patients were 54.3 months in those receiving MMC vs. 28.2 months in those receiving oxaliplatin (P=0.012), whereas in PSDSS III/IV patients, median OS rates were 19.4 months in those receiving MMC vs. 30.4 months in those receiving Oxaliplatin (P=0.427). ConclusionThese data suggest that MMC might be a better agent for HIPEC delivery than Oxaliplatin in patients with CRCPC, favorable histologies and low burden of disease (PSDSS I/II) undergoing complete cytoreduction. Propsective studies are warranted, which stratify patients by their PSDSS and randomize them to HIPEC with MMC vs. Oxaliplatin. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 110:779-785. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available