4.5 Article

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Pattern of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis and Thus the Overall Survival

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 445-450

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23845

Keywords

neutrophil; lymphocyte; ratio; colorectal; liver; metastasis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveWe investigate the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a potential prognostic factor for patients undergoing curative liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). MethodsWe identified patients who underwent liver resection, via our prospectively accumulated surgical database at the Royal Marsden Hospital and The London Clinic, by two liver surgeons (SM and AZK) between January 2005 and December 2012 and patients included had liver resection for CRLM and received preoperative chemotherapy with an NLR>2.5 considered elevated. NLR's role in disease-free, post-recurrence and overall survival was determined by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. ResultsOne hundred and sixty nine patients were enrolled. Seventy-one patients (42%) demonstrated NLR>2.5. Elevated NLR was associated with decreased OS in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR 2.12; 95% CI, 1.18-3.82; P=0.012) but not with DFS. Analyzed as continuous variable, higher NLR was associated with decreased OS(HR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-132; P=0.011) and associated with increased risk of extrahepatic/multifocal recurrence (P=0.007), linked in this way with a decreased post-recurrence survival (HR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.02-1.52; P=0.032). ConclusionsElevated NLR in patients who undergo hepatectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for CRLM increases risk of extrahepatic/multifocal recurrence and is an independent predictor of overall survival. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:445-450. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available