4.5 Article

Phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by gastrectomy for clinically resectable type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancers (JCOG0210)

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages 741-745

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23301

Keywords

gastric cancer; preoperative chemotherapy; type 4 gastric cancer; linitis plastica; type 3 gastric cancer

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan [14S-3, 14S-4, H13-Gan-014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1+cisplatin followed by gastrectomy in patients with linitis plastica (type 4) or large ulcero-invasive-type (type 3) gastric cancer. Methods Eligibility criteria included histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; clinically resectable gastric cancer of type 4 or type 3. Patients received two 28-day courses of preoperative chemotherapy of S-1 (80120mg/body, p.o., days 121) and cisplatin (CDDP; 60mg/m2, i.v., day 8). Primary endpoints were completion of protocol treatment and incidence of treatment-related death (TRD). Results Among the 49 eligible patients with the median age of 61 years, 36 completed the protocol treatment comprising two courses of preoperative chemotherapy and R0/1 resection (73.5% completion, 80% CI, 63.781.7%). One TRD was observed during the first course of chemotherapy. Median survival and 3-year overall survival were 17.3 months and 24.5%, respectively. Conclusions Preoperative chemotherapy with S-1+CDDP followed by gastrectomy is a safe and promising treatment for type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancers. Based on the results of this study, we are now conducting a phase III study (JCOG0501) to confirm the superiority of this treatment. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;107:741745. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available