4.5 Article

Comparison of recurrence patterns between 5 years and >5 years after curative operations in colorectal cancer patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages 9-13

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23349

Keywords

colorectal cancer; recurrence; patterns; early; late

Funding

  1. Asan Institute for Life Sciences [2011-069]
  2. Korea Health 21 R D Project [A062254]
  3. Centre for Development and Commercialization of Anti-Cancer Therapeutics [A102059]
  4. Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objectives To identify characteristics of recurrent colorectal cancer in terms of follow-up periods, that is, 5 years and >5 years after curative operations Methods This study enrolled 4,023 patients. Of them, 835 patients showed recurrence after primary curative resection for colorectal cancer. Recurrence occurred 5 years (n=799) or >5 years (n=36) after curative surgery. Variables and recurrence patterns were compared between the groups. Results Among the 835 patients who experienced recurrence, only 4.3% recurred >5 years after surgery. This group showed lower preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, more tumors with expanding growth, well-differentiated histology, and no lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). In terms of haematogenous metastasis, lung or liver was the most prevalent site in patients who recurred after >5 years or 5 years, respectively (P=0.005). In rectal cancer patients, recurrence patterns revealed the same results. In colon cancer patients, the liver was the most prevalent site in both groups. Conclusions After 5 years of follow-up, routine surveillance for detecting other malignancies seems to be sufficient. However, the possibility of late (particularly late pulmonary) recurrence should be considered. Radiologic examination to detect pulmonary metastasis should be considered in the follow-up program. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;108:9-13. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available