4.5 Article

Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas With Low-Level Microsatellite Instability in Korea: Do They Form a Distinct Subgroup With Distinguished Clinicopathological Features?

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 6, Pages 351-355

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.21239

Keywords

microsatellite instability; microsatellite stable; colorectal cancer; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The biologic significance of low-level microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancers (CRCs) remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate whether sporadic MSI-low CRCs in Korea displayed distinguished clinicopathological characteristics from microsatellites stable (MSS) and MSI-high CRCs. Methods: We consecutively enrolled 657 patients who underwent their first surgical resections for stage I-IV sporadic CRCs and compared their clinicopathological features and prognosis after resection according to MSI status (574 MSS, 30 MSI-low and 53 MSI-high CRCs). Results: When compared with MSS CRCs, MSI-low CRCs showed significantly more frequent association with poorly differentiated histology, mucinous carcinoma, and large tumor size. In addition, MSI-low CRCs demonstrated significantly less frequent lymph node metastasis and advanced tumor stage than MSS CRCs. When compared with MSI-high CRCs, MSI-low CRCs were significantly more frequently located in distal colon. Three-year overall and disease-free survival rates of MSS, MSI-low and MSI-high CRCs were 83.5%, 90.0% and 91.7% and 82.02%, 89.1% and 87.5%, respectively and neither demonstrated significant difference between three groups. Conclusions: These results indicated that sporadic MSI-low CRCs in Korea displayed distinguished clinicopathological features and might form a distinct subgroup especially from MSS CRCs. Further large studies are required to evaluate the impact of MSI-low status on prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available