4.5 Article

The effect of mineralogy and effective normal stress on frictional strength of sheet silicates

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 49-61

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2012.06.015

Keywords

Fault gouge; Friction coefficients; Phyllosilicates; Clays

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BE 4263/1-1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C001117/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phyllosilicates are common constituents of upper crustal faults and subduction forearcs. We studied the effect of mineralogy and controlled effective normal stress (between 5 MPa and 100 MPa) on frictional strength. Although the effect of mineralogy on frictional strength of single-phase phyllosilicate gouges has been previously studied, the influence of effective normal stress has not. We conducted water-saturated and vacuum-dry frictional tests on single-phase phyllosilicate gouges using a triaxial apparatus. Minerals included talc, pyrophyllite, kaolinite, lizardite, illite, montmorillonite, chlorite, muscovite, phlogopite, and biotite (particle size <30 mu m). Results show friction coefficients between 0.22 - 0.44 (dry) and 0.12-0.38 (wet). Wet strength is always lower than dry strength for the same phyllosilicate, and those with hydrophilic surfaces are especially weakened by water. Tri-octahedral minerals are weaker than di-octahedral minerals with otherwise similar structures. The dependence of friction on interlayer bond strength is less clear than previously suggested. At effective normal stresses > 20 MPa dry friction coefficients are constant, and wet friction coefficients show a small increase. This is attributed to loss of water and increased contact area. The results indicate that frictional strength of clay-rich faults increases at depths less than approximate to 1 km under hydrostatic pore fluid pressures. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available