4.4 Article

Testing and Design of Aluminum Alloy Cross Sections in Compression

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 140, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000972

Keywords

Aluminum alloy; Angle; Buckling; Compressive capacities; Continuous strength method; Experimental investigation; Plain channel; Square and rectangular hollow sections; Structural design; Stub columns; Testing; Metal and composite structures

Funding

  1. University of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aluminum alloys are used in a wide range of engineering applications and are gaining increasing usage in the construction sector, offering high strength-to-weight ratios and good durability. In this paper, a series of stub-column tests on aluminum alloy box sections with and without internal cross stiffeners is carried out to investigate cross-section capacity and to explore the possible exploitation of strain hardening in design. All existing stub-column test results from the literature were also collected. A database containing the results from 346 tests on aluminum alloy stub columns of box, channel, and angle sections, with a wide range of cross-section slendernesses, was formed. The test strengths were compared with the design strengths predicted by the current American, Australian/New Zealand, and European specifications. Furthermore, the test strengths were compared with those predicted by the deformation-based continuous strength method (CSM). Following reliability analyses, the design strengths predicted by the three current design specifications were found to be generally conservative, whereas the CSM offered improved design capacities, owing to its allowance for strain hardening. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available