4.4 Article

Fast-to-Compute Weakly Coupled Ductile Fracture Model for Structural Steels

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Volume 140, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001025

Keywords

Ductility; Cracking; Coupling; Stress analysis; Steel; Plasticity; Ductile fracture; Weakly coupled model; Stress triaxiality; A992 steel; Plasticity; Analysis and computation

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [CMS-0928547]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [0928547] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ductile fracture in metals can be simulated either by coupled or by uncoupled fracture models. Although the coupled models simulate the gradual loss of strength resulting from the initiation of the damage attributable to microvoid nucleation, growth and coalescence, the uncoupled models can describe critical the conditions under which ductile fracture initiates. Even though the coupled models can completely characterize the ductile damage process, calibration of these models is difficult and their computational implementation is expensive when compared with the uncoupled fracture models. This study is concerned with development of a fracture model that can simulate the ductile fracture process in steels like coupled models with the computational efficiency of the uncoupled models. To this end, a weakly coupled fracture model that can efficiently simulate the ductile fracture process is introduced. The weakly coupled model is proposed based on a micromechanical void growth model and is calibrated using the experimental data from notched steel specimens. The weakly coupled fracture model is successfully used to simulate failure resulting from ductile fracture in specimens made up of different batches of ASTM A992 steels and in specimens made up of ASTM A572 steels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available