Journal
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages 705-717Publisher
ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000300
Keywords
Building structure; Experimental modal analysis; System identification; Modal parameters; Shake table tests
Funding
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Englekirk Center Board of Advisors
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A full-scale 7-story reinforced concrete building slice was tested on the unidirectional University of California-San Diego Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (UCSD-NEES) shake table during the period from October 2005 to January 2006. A rectangular wall acted as the main lateral force resisting system of the building slice. The shake table tests were designed to damage the building progressively through four historical earthquake records. The objective of the seismic tests was to validate a new displacement-based design methodology for reinforced concrete shear wall building structures. At several levels of damage, ambient vibration tests and low-amplitude white noise base excitation tests were applied to the building, which responded as a quasi-linear system with dynamic parameters evolving as a function of structural damage. Six different state-of-the-art system identification algorithms, including three output-only and three input-output methods were used to estimate the modal parameters (natural frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes) at different damage levels based on the response of the building to ambient as well as white noise base excitations, measured using DC-coupled accelerometers. The modal parameters estimated at various damage levels using different system identification methods are compared to (1) validate/cross-check the modal identification results and study the performance of each of these system identification methods, and to (2) investigate the sensitivity of the identified modal parameters to actual structural damage. For a given damage level, the modal parameters identified using different methods are found to be in good agreement, indicating that these estimated modal parameters are likely to be close to the actual modal parameters of the building specimen. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000300. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available