4.2 Article

Neuroprotective Effect of Punicalagin against Cerebral Ischemia Reperfusion-induced Oxidative Brain Injury in Rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 2869-2878

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.020

Keywords

Cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury; oxidative stress; punicalagin; antioxidant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Punicalagin (PG) is a hydrolyzable polyphenol in Punica granatum. It has been previously reported that it has a protective effect against hypoxia-induced ischemia brain injury. It is a potent antioxidant. The present study is aimed to evaluate the antioxidant potential of PG against focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Methods: Rats were randomly divided into sham, MCAO, PG-treated groups. PG (15 and 30 mg/kg) vehicle was administered orally for 7 days before MCAO. Rats were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg), xylazine (10 mg/kg), and subjected to 2 hours occlusion, and 22 hours reperfusion. Neurologic deficit, brainwater content (BWC), histopathology changes, and oxidative stress markers were evaluated after 22 hours of reperfusion. In comparison with MCAO model group, treatment with PG significantly reduced the neurologic deficit scores and BWC. Results: PG-attenuated neuronal damage occurred by downregulating the levels of malondialdehyde, sodium-potassiumadenosine triphosphatase activity, nitric oxide, protein carbonyl content, and mitochondria-generated reactive oxygen species and upregulating the superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, reduced glutathione, glutathione reductase activities. Conclusions: Taken together, these results suggested that supplementation of PG treatment effectively ameliorates the cerebral ischemia/reperfusion induced oxidative damage by virtue of its antioxidant potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available