4.4 Article

A Time-Saving Method to Assess Power Output at Lactate Threshold in Well-Trained and Elite Cyclists

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 622-629

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a73e70

Keywords

testing; cycling; aerobic endurance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Storen, O, Ronnestad, BR, Sunde, A, Hansen, J, Ellefsen, S, and Helgerud, J. A time-saving method to assess power output at lactate threshold in well-trained and elite cyclists. J Strength Cond Res 28(3): 622-629, 2014-The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between lactate threshold (LT) as a percentage of maximal oxygen consumption ((V)over dot(O2)max) and power output at LT (LTW) and also to investigate to what extent (V)over dot(O2)max, oxygen cost of cycling (C-C), and maximal aerobic power (MAP) determine LTW in cycling to develop a new time-saving model for testing LTW. To do this, 108 male competitive cyclists with an average (V)over dot(O2)max of 65.2 +/- 7.4 ml.kg(-1).min(-1) and an average LTW of 274 +/- 43 W were tested for (V)over dot(O2)max, LT %(V)over dot(O2)max, LTW, MAP, and C-C on a test ergometer cycle. The product of MAP and individual LT in %(V)over dot(O2)max was found to be a good determinant of LTW (R = 0.98, p < 0.0001). However, LT in %(V)over dot(O2)max was found to be a poor determinant of LTW (R = 0.39, p < 0.0001). Based on these findings, we have suggested a new time-saving method for calculating LTW in well-trained cyclists. The benefits from this model come both from tracking LTW during training interventions and from regularly assessing training status in competitive cyclists. Briefly, this method is based on the present findings that LTW depends on LT in %(V)over dot(O2)max, V(V)over dot(O2)max, and C-C and may after an initial test session reduce the time for the subsequent testing of LTW by as much as 50% without the need for blood samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available