4.4 Article

An Adequate Interset Rest Period for Strength Recovery During a Common Isokinetic Test

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 1981-1987

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182764d70

Keywords

work:rest ratio; ATP-PC system; fatigue; standardization; peak torque

Categories

Funding

  1. Metairie Orthopedic and Sports Therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isokinetic testing is used in rehabilitation settings on a regular basis; yet, there is a lack of consistency in rest period usage among protocols. Furthermore, the allotment of rest periods has been arbitrary (e.g., 30, 60, 90 seconds or more). This investigation examines the work:rest ratio as an effective method of standardizing rest periods in isokinetic testing. The purpose of this study was to establish an adequate rest period that would allow reproducibility of strength during a common isokinetic strength test. Twenty-seven healthy college-aged men (age, 23 +/- 3.8 years; body weight, 79.54 +/- 11.09 kg) were tested on 5 separate occasions: 2 familiarization sessions and 3 experimental sessions. Each subject performed a knee extension/flexion isokinetic strength protocol (Cybex NORM; Lumex, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY, USA) to determine peak torque by performing 5 maximal reciprocal repetitions at each ascending velocity of 60, 180, and 300 degrees s(-1). Work:rest ratios of 1:3, 1:8, and 1:12 were counterbalanced between sets. A 3 x 3 repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the data. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all tests. There was no significant difference in either knee extension or knee flexion peak torque when comparing work:rest ratios. These findings suggest that a 1:3 work:rest ratio is sufficient during a common isokinetic strength test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available