4.4 Article

Effect of Intensity of Aerobic Training on Insulin Sensitivity/Resistance in Recreationally Active Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 2270-2276

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827da2f0

Keywords

insulin effectiveness; HOMA; interval training; maximal oxygen consumption

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grieco, CR, Swain, DP, Colberg, SR, Dowling, EA, Baskette, K, Zarrabi, L, Gandrakota, R, Kotipalli, U, Sechrist, SR, and Somma, CT. Effect of intensity of aerobic training on insulin sensitivity/resistance in recreationally active adults. J Strength Cond Res 27(8): 2270-2276, 2013Previous research demonstrates that moderate-intensity aerobic exercise improves insulin effectiveness. Whether higher exercise intensities improve insulin action more so is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various levels of aerobic intensity on insulin action in young adult men and women. Forty-five healthy subjects (22.2 +/- 3.9 years; 169 +/- 9 cm; 74.5 +/- 17.8 kg) were matched for age, gender, and V.o(2)max and randomly assigned to moderate-intensity (50% heart rate reserve [HRR]), vigorous-intensity (75% HRR), maximal-intensity intervals (95/50% HRR) or a non-exercising control group. Subjects completed a 6-week training protocol on a stationary bicycle ergometer. Weekly duration and frequency of training varied to ensure equivalent energy expenditure across groups. The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were used to assess insulin effectiveness. Significant increases occurred after training in V.o(2)max in the vigorous-intensity(15.4%) and maximal-intensity(14.2%) groups (p < 0.01) but not the moderate-intensity or control group. There were no significant changes in insulin effectiveness in any exercise group. Training intensity did not significantly affect insulin effectiveness in a young adult population as assessed by HOMA or QUICKI; it did, however, significantly affect V.o(2)max.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available