4.3 Review

Heat Shock Proteins: A Review of the Molecular Chaperones for Plant Immunity

Journal

PLANT PATHOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 323-333

Publisher

KOREAN SOC PLANT PATHOLOGY
DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.RW.08.2015.0150

Keywords

chaperones; heat shock proteins; plant immunity

Funding

  1. faculty research fund of Sejong University
  2. framework of international cooperation program [2015K2A24000129]
  3. basic science research program [2013R1A1A1059051]
  4. Rural Development Administration [PJ009774]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A1059051] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As sessile organisms, plants are exposed to persistently changing stresses and have to be able to interpret and respond to them. The stresses, drought, salinity, chemicals, cold and hot temperatures, and various pathogen attacks have interconnected effects on plants, resulting in the disruption of protein homeostasis. Maintenance of proteins in their functional native conformations and preventing aggregation of non-native proteins are important for cell survival under stress. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) functioning as molecular chaperones are the key components responsible for protein folding, assembly, translocation, and degradation under stress conditions and in many normal cellular processes. Plants respond to pathogen invasion using two different innate immune responses mediated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) or resistance (R) proteins. HSPs play an indispensable role as molecular chaperones in the quality control of plasma membrane-resident PRRs and intracellular R proteins against potential invaders. Here, we specifically discuss the functional involvement of cytosolic and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) HSPs/chaperones in plant immunity to obtain an integrated understanding of the immune responses in plant cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available