4.6 Article

Sprinting analysis of elite soccer players during European Champions League and UEFA Cup matches

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 28, Issue 14, Pages 1489-1494

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.521166

Keywords

Soccer; playing positions; sprinting activity; leading sprint; explosive sprint

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been suggested that assessment of high-intensity activities during a match is a valid measure of physical performance in elite soccer. Recently, sprinting activities have been analysed in more depth. The aim of this study was to develop a detailed analysis of the sprinting activities of different playing positions during European Champions League and UEFA Cup competitions. Altogether, 717 elite outfield soccer players were evaluated throughout 2002-2006 using ProZone (R) (Leeds, UK). Sprinting (explosive and leading) was analysed for each playing position. To compare positional differences, a Kruskal-Wallis analysis was performed. Differences were found among positions for total number of sprints and total sprint distance covered: wide midfielders(attackers=wide defenders)central midfielderscentral defenders (P0.001), as well as for explosive sprints: (wide midfielders=attackers=wide defenders)central defenders, wide midfielderscentral midfielderscentral defenders and attackers=wide defenders=central midfielders (P0.001), and leading sprints: wide midfielders(attackers=wide defenders)central midfielderscentral defenders (P0.001). For each group, there were no differences in ratio of explosive to leading sprints. Wide midfielders performed a higher number of sprints in all five distance categories than all other positions. This study showed that sprinting characteristics are influenced by position. Wide midfielders have to complete additional high-intensity activities during training sessions compared with the other positions to achieve the performance level required during the match.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available