4.6 Article

Mechanisms for the relationships between water-use efficiency and carbon isotope composition and specific leaf area of maize (Zea mays L.) under water stress

Journal

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 77, Issue 2, Pages 233-243

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-015-0056-8

Keywords

Water-use efficiency; Bundle sheath leakiness; Carbon isotope composition; Specific leaf area; Maize; Water stress

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of science [XDA05050502, XDB15030302, ISSASIP1118]
  2. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2014CB954500]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471182]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quick assessment approaches for accurately measuring water-use efficiency (WUE) in maize under water stress are important to water-saving agriculture. We investigated how and whether carbon isotope composition (delta C-13) and specific leaf area (SLA) could be used to assess WUE for maize as influenced by water stress. A pot experiment was conducted twice during six typical maize (Zea mays) growth stages of seedling, jointing, booting, tasseling, filling and maturity, respectively. The ratio between the activities of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase decreased bundle sheath leakiness (phi) under water deficiency, caused more C-13 to be assimilated, and resulted in increased delta C-13 in leaves. Water stress increased the fractionation of C-13 when assimilates were transported from leaf to stem, indicating that water stress affected leaf expansion and translocation of assimilates from leaf to stem, and resulted in thicker leaves and lower SLA. WUE showed significant positive correlations with leaf delta C-13 and SLA, implying that leaf delta C-13 and SLA could effectively reflect the drought adaptation and high WUE under different water conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available