4.0 Article

Impact of impairment and secondary health conditions on health preference among Canadians with chronic spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 361-370

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000046

Keywords

Health status; Outcomes assessment (health care); Quality of life; Spinal cord injuries; Tetraplegia; Paraplegia; Utility theory

Funding

  1. Physician Services incorporated Foundation [08-22]
  2. Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation
  3. Rick Hansen Institute [2010-RHI-MTNI-836]
  4. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
  5. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in Ontario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context/objectives: To describe the relationships between secondary health conditions and health preference in a cohort of adults with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Study design: Cross-sectional telephone survey. Setting: Community. Participants: Community-dwelling adult men and women (N= 357) with chronic traumatic and non-traumatic SCI (C1-L3 AIS A-D) who were at least 1 year post-injury/onset. Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome measures: Health Utilities Index-Mark III (HUI-Mark III) and SCI Secondary Conditions Scale-Modified (SCS-M). Results: SCS-M responses for different secondary health conditions were used to create low impact = absent/mild and high impact = moderate/significant secondary health condition groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in HUI-Mark III scores for different secondary health conditions while controlling for impairment. The mean HUI-Mark III was 0.24 (0.27, range, -0.28 to 1.00). HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.001) in high impact groups for spasms, bladder and bowel dysfunction, urinary tract infections, autonomic dysreflexia, circulatory problems, respiratory problems, chronic pain, joint pain, psychological distress, and depression compared with the low impact groups. As well, HUI-Mark III scores were lower (P < 0.05) in high impact groups for pressure sores, unintentional injuries, contractures, heterotopic bone ossification, sexual dysfunction, postural hypotension, cardiac problems, and neurological deterioration than low-impact groups. Conclusion: High-impact secondary health conditions are negatively associated with health preference in persons with SCI. Although further work is required, the HUI-Mark III data may be a useful tool for calculating quality-adjusted life years, and advocating for additional resources where secondary health conditions have substantial adverse impact on health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available