4.1 Article

Late Holocene marine terraces of the Cartagena region, southern Caribbean: The product of neotectonism or a former high stand in sea-level?

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 214-224

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2009.08.010

Keywords

Sea-level changes; Neotectonics; Southern Caribbean; Holocene; Mollusks; Foraminifera; Ostracoda

Funding

  1. Foundation for the Promotion of Science and Technology and Universidad EAFIT
  2. JSPS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detailed stratigraphic survey and paleontological study (mollusks, corals, foraminifera and ostracods) of four low-level, similar to 3 m, marine terrace sections: Punta Canoas, Manzanillo del Mar, Playa de Oro, and Tierra Bomba Island, from the Cartagena region, southern Caribbean, supplemented with 22 radiocarbon dates, reveals that the northern terraces were deposited as parasequences in a clastic depositional system compared to the Tierra Bomba Island succession that was deposited in a carbonate depositional system between similar to 3600 and similar to 1700 cal yrs BP. Drier conditions and the southern location of the ITCZ at about 3 ka triggered stronger easterly Trades and more dynamic southwestward sediment drift fed by the Magdalena River mouth, thus promoting the formation of sand spits that ultimately isolated the Cienaga de Tesca coastal lagoon from the Caribbean Sea. Our estimates support the hypothesis that the present position of the terraces is the product of neotectonism rather than a higher 3 ka, sea-level. Upheaval of the terraces varies between similar to 3.8 mmyr(-1) at Punta Canoas and similar to 2.2 mmyr(-1) at Tierra Bomba to similar to 1.5 mmyr(-1) at Manzanillo del Mar and Playa de Oro terraces. Our study corroborates previous contentions on the role of mud diapirism and the dynamics of the Dique Fault as late Holocene upheaval mechanisms. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available