4.3 Article

Electrochemical synthesis and characterization of solid-phase microextraction fibers using conductive polymers: application in extraction of benzaldehyde from aqueous solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 1763-1771

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-014-2414-2

Keywords

Electrochemical; Conductive polymers; Multiwalled carbon nanotubes; Benzaldehyde; Solid-phase microextraction; Gas chromatography

Funding

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, polyaniline, polypyrrole, and polyaniline/polypyrrole composite fibers were synthesized in the absence and presence of oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes using electrochemical cyclic voltammetry with CF3COOH as dopant. Thermal stability of these fibers was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Then, headspace solid-phase microextraction process coupled with gas chromatography and flame ionization detector was used for comparing extraction capability of benzaldehyde from aqueous solution. Since polyaniline fiber showed better extraction efficiency than the other fibers, its preparation conditions including acid concentration, aniline concentration, scan rate, and amount of multiwalled carbon nanotubes were studied by means of the one-factor-at-a-time method. The analytical performance of polyaniline fibers were investigated to determine benzaldehyde from the aqueous solution. The morphology and texture of polyaniline fibers were examined by field emission scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses. The attained results revealed that the perfect conditions for acid concentration, aniline concentration, scan rate, and multiwalled carbon nanotubes content were 0.5 M, 0.2 M, 25 mV s(-1), and 0.02 wt%, respectively. The limit of detection for the proposed polyaniline fiber was 15 ng ml(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available