4.3 Article

Morphology-controllable synthesis of LiMn2O4 particles as cathode materials of lithium batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 1201-1206

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-012-1980-4

Keywords

Manganese dioxide; Spinel lithium manganese oxide; Cathode; Lithium batteries

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1134002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [21273084]
  3. Natural Science Fund of Guangdong Province [10351063101000001]
  4. key project of Science and Technology in Guangdong Province [2012A010702003]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1134002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We reported a new method for the preparation of morphology-controllable LiMn2O4 particles. In this method, dimension-different MnO2 nanowires synthesized hydrothermally by adjusting the reaction temperature were used as the precursor. The morphology and structure of the resulting products were characterized with scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction, and the performances of the prepared LiMn2O4 samples as cathode material of lithium batteries were investigated by cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge/discharge test. The results indicate that the morphology of LiMn2O4 transforms from tridimensional particle (TP) to unidimensional rod (UR) through quadrate lamina (QL) with increasing the diameter and length of MnO2 nanowires. Although the cyclic stabilities of LiMn2O4-TP, LiMn2O4-QL, and LiMn2O4-UR are very close (the 0.1 C capacity after 50 cycles is 101, 93, and 99 mAh g(-1) at 25 A degrees C, and 84, 78, and 82 mAh g(-1) at 50 A degrees C, respectively), LiMn2O4-QL delivers much higher rate capacity (about 70 mAh g(-1) at 5 C and 30 mAh g(-1) at 10 C) than LiMn2O4-TP and LiMn2O4-UR (about 20 mAh g(-1) at 5 C, 3 mAh g(-1) at 10 C, 25 mAh g(-1) at 5 C, and 3 mAh g(-1) at 10 C).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available