4.3 Article

Preparation and electrochemical performance of the layered cobalt oxide (Co3O4) as supercapacitor electrode material

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 55-61

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-012-1856-7

Keywords

Co3O4; Polyvinyl pyrrolidone; Hydrothermal method; Supercapacitor

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation in Gansu Science and Technology Committee [0803RJA005]
  2. International Cooperation Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology [2010DFB90690-4]
  3. International Cooperation Project of Shanxi Province [2010081031-2]
  4. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51002166, 51061130536, 51172251]
  5. Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths [2010021023-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Layered Co3O4 composed of oriented self-assembled micrometer-length rectangular 2D flakes has been successfully synthesized by a hydrothermal method in combination with subsequent calcination process. Structural and morphological characterizations were performed using powder X-ray diffraction and field emission scanning electron microscopy. The component and thermal stability of the sample were measured by FT-IR and thermal analyses, including thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis. The electrochemical performances of the as-prepared Co3O4 product were investigated by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and constant current charge/discharge techniques. The electrochemical results demonstrate that the layered Co3O4 product displays good capacitive behavior with a specific capacitance of 263 F g(-1) within a potential range of -0.4-0.55 V at a current density of 1 A g(-1) and a large capacity retention with 89.4 % of the initial capacitance over 1,000 consecutive cycles at 3 A g(-1), indicating that the as-prepared Co3O4 product can be a promising electroactive material for supercapacitor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available