4.6 Article

Facile sonochemical synthesis and photoluminescent properties of lanthanide orthophosphate nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 182, Issue 2, Pages 339-347

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.10.023

Keywords

Lanthanide orthophosphate; Ultrasonic irradiation; Nanoparticles; Formation mechanism; Luminescence

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Science
  2. MOST of China [2007CB935502]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50572103, 20431030, 00610227, 50872131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uniform lanthanide orthophosphate LnPO(4) (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho) nanoparticles have been systematically synthesized via a facile, fast, efficient ultrasonic irradiation of inorganic salt aqueous solution under ambient conditions without any surfactant or template. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), photoluminescence (PL) spectra as well as kinetic decays were employed to characterize the samples. The SEM and the TEM images show that the hexagonal structured lanthanide orthophosphate LnPO(4) (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd. Sm, Eu, Gd) products have nanorod bundles morphology, while the tetragonal LnPO(4) (Ln = Tb, Dy, Ho) samples prepared under the same experimental conditions are composed of nanoparticles. HRTEM micrographs and SAED results prove that these nanostructures are polycrystalline in nature. The possible formation mechanism for LnPO(4) (Ln = La-Gd) nanorod bundles is proposed. Eu3+-doped LaPO4 and Tb3+-doped CePO4 samples were also prepared by using the same synthetic process, which exhibit an orange-red (Eu3+:D-5(0)-F-7(1, 2, 3, 4)) and green (Tb3+, D-5(4)-F-7(3, 4, 5, 6)) emission, respectively. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available