4.8 Article

Genome-Wide Prediction and Validation of Intergenic Enhancers in Arabidopsis Using Open Chromatin Signatures

Journal

PLANT CELL
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 2415-2426

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.15.00537

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Program for Introducing Talents to Universities [B07017]
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0923640, MCB-1412948]
  3. Vilas Associate Fellowship from the University of Wisconsin-Madison
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1412948] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhancers are important regulators of gene expression in eukaryotes. Enhancers function independently of their distance and orientation to the promoters of target genes. Thus, enhancers have been difficult to identify. Only a few enhancers, especially distant intergenic enhancers, have been identified in plants. We developed an enhancer prediction system based exclusively on the DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. A set of 10,044 DHSs located in intergenic regions, which are away from any gene promoters, were predicted to be putative enhancers. We examined the functions of 14 predicted enhancers using the beta-glucuronidase gene reporter. Ten of the 14 (71%) candidates were validated by the reporter assay. We also designed 10 constructs using intergenic sequences that are not associated with DHSs, and none of these constructs showed enhancer activities in reporter assays. In addition, the tissue specificity of the putative enhancers can be precisely predicted based on DNase I hypersensitivity data sets developed from different plant tissues. These results suggest that the open chromatin signature-based enhancer prediction system developed in Arabidopsis may serve as a universal system for enhancer identification in plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available