4.6 Article

Liming effects on soil pH and crop yield depend on lime material type, application method and rate, and crop species: a global meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 1393-1406

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2120-2

Keywords

Liming; Liming material; Soil acidity; Soil nutrients; Yield

Funding

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-35-32]
  2. Shandong Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project [CXGC2016B03]
  3. Forage Industrial Innovation Team
  4. Shandong Modern Agricultural Industrial and Technical System [SDAIT-23-02]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201606180104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThe aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the interactive effects of environmental and managerial factors on soil pH and crop yield related to liming across different cropping systems on a global scale.Materials and methodsThis study examined the effects of liming rate, lime application method, and liming material type on various soil chemical properties and crop yield based on data collected from 175 published studies worldwide since 1980.Results and discussionThe most important variables that drive changes in soil pH and crop yield were liming rate and crop species, respectively. Soil conditions, such as initial soil organic matter and soil pH, were more important for increasing soil pH in field-based experiments, while lime material type and application method were more important for improving crop yield. To effectively neutralize soil acidity, the optimum liming duration, rate, and material type were<3years, 3-6Mgha(-1), and Ca (OH)(2), respectively. Averaged across different crop species, the application of CaO, CaCO3, Ca (OH)(2), and CaMg (CO3)(2) increased yield by 13.2, 34.3, 29.2, and 66.5%, respectively.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis will help design liming management strategies to ameliorate soil acidity and thus improve crop yield in agroecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available