4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Heavy metals and benzo[a]pyrene in soils from construction and demolition rubble

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1771-1780

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-014-0959-4

Keywords

Urban soil; Construction and demolition rubble; Heavy metals; Benzo[a]pyrene; Technosols; Geochemical load index

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation DFG [We 1125/26-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rubble is an important component of urban soils worldwide, especially in Europe. In Berlin, Germany, rubble-composed soils cover about 17 % of the total city area and 60 % of the inner city. This study assesses the contamination status of rubble soil, particularly for heavy metals and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). The results of 164 soil surveys in Berlin, including more than 2,000 analyzed soil samples of topsoils, rubble subsoils, and natural material, have been analyzed for typical contamination patterns. The concentrations of all contaminants range over several orders of magnitude and follow negatively skewed log-normal distribution functions. For rubble-containing subsoils, proportions of 34, 71, 67, 68, 74, and 61 % of the analyzed samples exceed precautionary values of the German Soil Conservation Act, regarding Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, Hg, and B[a]P, respectively. Similar results were found for topsoils. A minor part of the soils is contaminated with Cd, while Pb and Hg are the most typical contaminants of rubble material. In contrast to topsoils and rubble-containing subsoils, the majority of the natural subsoil material is not contaminated. Only low to moderate positive correlations were found between the contaminants. Compared to natural soil material, rubble-containing soil materials show clearly elevated concentrations of heavy metals and B[a]P. As the most characteristic contaminants for rubble are Pb and Hg, these heavy metals should first be analyzed as proxy contaminants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available