4.5 Article

A hard day's night: a longitudinal study on the relationships among job demands and job control, sleep quality and fatigue

Journal

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 374-383

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00735.x

Keywords

demand-control history; fatigue; longitudinal research; psychosocial work characteristics; sleep quality

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment
  2. The Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare, and Sports
  3. Dutch National Institute for Social Security

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This prospective four-wave study examined (i) the causal direction of the longitudinal relations among job demands, job control, sleep quality and fatigue; and (ii) the effects of stability and change in demand-control history on the development of sleep quality and fatigue. Based on results of a four-wave complete panel study among 1163 Dutch employees, we found significant effects of job demands and job control on sleep quality and fatigue across a 1-year time lag, supporting the strain hypothesis (Demand-Control model; Karasek and Theorell, Basic Books, New York, 1990). No reversed or reciprocal causal patterns were detected. Furthermore, our results revealed that cumulative exposure to a high-strain work environment (characterized by high job demands and low job control) was associated with elevated levels of sleep-related complaints. Cumulative exposure to a low-strain work environment (i.e. low job demands and high job control) was associated with the highest sleep quality and lowest level of fatigue. Our results revealed further that changes in exposure history were related to changes in reported sleep quality and fatigue across time. As expected, a transition from a non-high-strain towards a high-strain job was associated with a significant increase in sleep-related complaints; conversely, a transition towards a non-high-strain job was not related to an improvement in sleep-related problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available