4.7 Article

Divergence in physiological responses between cyanobacterial and lichen crusts to a gradient of simulated nitrogen deposition

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 399, Issue 1-2, Pages 121-134

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2687-y

Keywords

Fluorescence; Chlorophyll; Peroxidase; Catalase; Gurbantunggut desert

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471251]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2014CB954202]
  3. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences [XBBS-2014-20]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2015356]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen (N) deposition in arid lands is known to be increasing. However, N deposition gradients have unclear effects on physiological characteristics of biocrusts. This study tested if physiological characteristics are stimulated by low levels of N deposition and reduced by high levels of N deposition. We simulated N deposition at various rates to plots of cyanobacterial and lichen biocrusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert and measured indicators of growth and stress. In cyanobacterial crusts, most evidence suggests that biomass and growth are unaffected by lower levels of N but suppressed at the highest level. Biomass and growth of lichen crusts were less sensitive to N addition but, in the case of actual photochemical efficiency, were also suppressed at the highest N addition rate. Most osmotic adjustment substances of cyanobacterial and lichen crusts did not show significant responses after N addition. In the two crusts, minor increase in antioxidative enzyme activity was found in some N addition rates but no similar trends between the crust types were observed. Physiological performance of cyanobacterial crusts was more sensitive to high levels of N addition than that of lichen crusts. Increasing N deposition might greatly affect cyanobacterial crusts before lichen crusts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available