4.7 Article

Carbon and nitrogen partitioning of wheat and field pea grown with two nitrogen levels under elevated CO2

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 391, Issue 1-2, Pages 367-382

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2441-5

Keywords

C-13 pulse-labelling; Carbon and nitrogen cycling; CO(2)xN interaction; High atmospheric CO2; Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE); N-15

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP100200757]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP100200757] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims Crop responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 are likely to be different in semi-arid cropping systems of Australia. This experiment aimed to investigate the interactive effects of atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen (N) fertiliser on carbon (C) and N partitioning in the soil-plant system of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Methods Plants were grown with 40 or 100 mg N kg(-1) under ambient CO2 (390 ppm) or elevated CO2 (eCO(2); 550 ppm) using free-air CO2 enrichment (SoilFACE). Repeated 13CO(2) pulse labelling was used to quantify C transfer via plant to the soil. Destructive sampling was performed at grain filling and maturity. Results eCO(2) increased shoot biomass of field pea (36 %) and wheat (55 %) but only increased root biomass of wheat (13.5 %) in the 25-50 cm soil layer. Total N content of both species was greater under eCO(2), and for field pea it indicated enhanced biological N-2 fixation. However, eCO(2) increased the C:N ratio of wheat even at the high N level. Greater C-13 in soil of wheat grown under eCO(2) indicated a minor increase in soil C via rhizodeposition. Conclusions Increased biomass and C:N ratio of wheat could have implications for residue decomposition. eCO(2) and low N tended to increase grain yield but the increase was highly variable and not significant. Additional N content of field pea under eCO(2) exceeded the N that would be removed in wheat grain, albeit with lower than expected grain yield due to dry conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available