4.5 Article

Ultrasound/microwave-assisted solid-liquid-solid dispersive extraction with high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of neonicotinoid insecticides in Dendrobium officinale

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 121-127

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201400872

Keywords

Dendrobium officinale; Microwave-assisted extraction; Neonicotinoid insecticides; Solid-liquid-solid dispersive extraction; Ultrasound-assisted extraction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207118]
  2. National Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY14B070008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A one-step ultrasound/microwave-assisted solid-liquid-solid dispersive extraction procedure was used for the simultaneous determination of eight neonicotinoids (dinotefuran, nitenpyram, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, thiacloprid, imidaclothiz) in dried Dendrobium officinale by liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionization triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The samples were quickly extracted by acetonitrile and cleaned up by the mixed dispersing sorbents including primary secondary amine, C-18, and carbon-GCB. Parameters that could influence the ultrasound/microwave-assisted extraction efficiency such as microwave irradiation power, ultrasound irradiation power, temperature, and solvent were investigated. Recovery studies were performing well (70.4-113.7%) at three examined spiking levels (10, 50, and 100 mu g/kg). Meanwhile, the limits of quantification for the neonicotinoids ranged from 0.87 to 1.92 mu g/kg. The method showed good linearity in the concentration range of 1-100 mu g/L with correlation coefficients >0.99. This quick and useful analytical method could provide a basis for monitoring neonicotinoid insecticide residues in herbs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available