4.5 Article

Development of a solid-phase microextraction fiber coated with poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) and its application for the determination of chlorophenols in water coupled with GC

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 13, Pages 2121-2127

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200979

Keywords

Chlorophenol; GC; Poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate); Solid-phase microextraction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50938004]
  2. Environmental Monitor Scientific Foundation of Jiangsu Province [1011]
  3. Graduate Education Innovation of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ11_0050]
  4. Agilent Technologies Foundation [0851, 2190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A solid-phasemicroextraction (SPME) fiber coatedwith poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) coupled to GC with a micro electron-capture detector was developed for the determination of four chlorphenols in water samples for the first time. A novel and simple method for the preparation of this novel SPME fiber was proposed by copolymerization of methacrylic acid and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in an appropriate solvent using a glass capillary as a mold. The factors affecting the polymerization were optimized in detail. Furthermore, the extraction performance of the poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) fiber was evaluated. Moreover, experimental headspace-SPME parameters, such as extraction temperature, extraction time, salt concentration, stirring speed, and pH, were optimized by orthogonal array experimental designs. Under the optimized conditions, the target analytes were linear in the range of 0.2-50 ng/mL, and the correlation coefficients were all greater than 0.99. RSD was less than 8.9%, and the detection limits were in the range of 0.1-10 ng/L. Four cholorphenols were detected from tap and lake water samples using the proposed method, with the recoveries of spiked natural water samples were ranged from 91.8 to 110.8, and 90.6 to 111.4% for tap and lake water samples, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available