4.5 Article

Solid-phase extraction based on magnetic core-shell silica nanoparticles coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of low concentration pesticides in aqueous samples

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 18, Pages 2430-2437

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200260

Keywords

Aqueous sample; GC-MS; Magnetic solid-phase extraction; Nanoparticles; Pesticides

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for young scientists of China [21105027]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Xinjiang Production and Construction corps [2100BA031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple and effective preconcentration method based on magnetic coreshell silica nanoparticles with C18-modified surface was developed for the analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Several kinds of organophosphorous and pyrethroid pesticides including methamidophos, dichlorvos, orthene, phorate, dimethoate, carbofuran, bifenthrin, fenpropathrin, cypermethrin, fenvalerate, and deltamethrin were used as model compounds to systematically evaluate the method. Various parameters, including the amounts of magnetic nanoparticles absorbents, extraction time, eluting solvent, eluting volume, and sample pH values were optimized. The optimized method affords low detection limits (signal-to-noise ratio = 3) from 0.001 to 0.008 mu g/L, and shows good linearity with correlation coefficients over 0.9990 in the concentration range of 0.0250.5 mu g/L. Average recoveries at three spiked levels were in the range of 70.2110.2% with relative standard deviations below 9.6%. A maximum enrichment factor of 1015 times was achieved. Analysis results of poisoned pond water indicate that this method is fast, convenient, and efficient for the detections of low-concentration pesticides in aqueous samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available