4.5 Article

Polypyrrole/graphene composite-coated fiber for the solid-phase microextraction of phenols

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 19, Pages 2765-2772

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201100303

Keywords

GC; Graphene; Phenols; Polypyrrole; Solid-phase microextraction

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Projects of Fujian Province [2010Y0050]
  2. Nature Scientific Foundation of Fujian [2009J01042]
  3. Science and Technology of Xiamen for University Innovation [3502Z20093004]
  4. National Nature Scientific Foundation of China-Korea [20911140274]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A polypyrrole (Ppy)/graphene (G) composite was developed and applied as a novel coating for use in solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography (GC). The Ppy/G-coated fiber was prepared by electrochemically polymerizing pyrrole and G on a stainless-steel wire. The extraction efficiency of Ppy/G-coated fiber for five phenols was the highest compared with the fibers coated with either Ppy or Ppy/graphene oxide (GO) using the same method preparation. Significantly, compared with various commercial fibers, the extraction efficiency of Ppy/G-coated fiber is better than or comparable to 85 mu m CAR/PDMS fiber (best extraction efficiency of phenol, o-cresol, and m-cresol in commercial fibers) and 85 mu m polyacrylate (PA) fiber (best extraction efficiency of 2,4-dichlorophenol and p-bromophenol in commercial fibers). The effects of extraction and desorption parameters such as extraction time, stirring rate, and desorption temperature and time on the extraction/desorption efficiency were investigated and optimized. The calibration curves were linear from 10 to 1000 mu g/L for o-cresol, m-cresol, p-bromophenol, and 2,4-dichlorophenol, and from 50 to 1000 mu g/L for phenol. The detection limits were within the range 0.34-3.4 mu g/L. The single fiber and fiber-to-fiber reproducibilities were <8.3 (n=7) and 13.3% (n=4), respectively. The recovery of the phenols spiked in natural water samples at 200 mu g/L ranged from 74.1 to 103.9% and the relative standard deviations were <3.7%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available