4.5 Article

Evaluation of a novel microextraction technique for aqueous samples: Porous membrane envelope filled with multiwalled carbon nanotubes coated with molecularly imprinted polymer

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 707-715

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000791

Keywords

HPLC; Microextraction; Molecularly imprinted polymer; Triazines

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20705042]
  2. Opening Foundation of Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Ministry of Education
  3. Science Foundation of Dalian University of Technology [852002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel microextraction technique based on membrane-protected multiwalled carbon nanotubes coated with molecularly imprinted polymer (MWCNTs-MIP) was developed. In this technique, MWCNTs-MIP were packed inside a polypropylene membrane envelope, which was then clamped onto a paper clip. For extraction, the packed membrane envelope was first impregnated with toluene and then placed in sample solutions. Target analytes in the solutions were first extracted into toluene in the membrane envelope, and were then extracted specifically onto the MWCNTs-MIP. After the extraction, target analytes were desorbed in methanol for liquid chromatography analysis. MWCNTs-MIP of prometryn were used as a model to demonstrate the feasibility of this novel microextraction technique. Factors affecting the extraction including organic solvent, stirring rate, extraction time, salt concentration, and pH were investigated. Under the optimized conditions, the limits of detection (a signal-to-noise ratio of 3) for the selected triazine herbicides were 0.08-0.38 mu g/L. The prepared membrane envelope could be used at least 50 times. The developed method was used for the analysis of the triazines spiked in river water, wastewater, and liquid milk, with recoveries ranging from 79.3-97.4, 58.9-110.3 and 76.2-104.9%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available