4.5 Article

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in milk

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 9, Pages 1084-1090

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000767

Keywords

GC-MS; Milk sample; Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs); Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); SPE combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction

Funding

  1. International Cooperation Project of Wenzhou City [H20090079, H20090080, S20100034]
  2. Analyzing and Testing Foundation of Zhejiang Provine [2009F70045]
  3. Health Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2009A136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An effective multi-residue pretreatment technique, solid-phase extraction (SPE) combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), was proposed for the trace analysis of 14 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in milk samples using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Interesting analytes in milk samples were extracted with hexane after protein precipitation. The hexane extracts were loaded on an LC-Florisil column to isolate analytes from the milk matrix. The elutes were dried and dissolved in acetone, which was used as the disperser solvent in subsequent DLLME procedures. The effects of several important parameters on the extraction efficiency were evaluated. Under the optimized conditions, a linear relationship was obtained in the range of 0.02-10.00 mu g/L (PCBs) and 0.5-100.00 mu g/L (PBDEs). The LOD (S/N=3) and relative standard deviations (RSDs, n=5) for all analytes were 0.01-0.4 mu g/L and 0.6-8.5%, respectively. The recoveries of the standards added to raw bovine milk samples were 74.0-131.8%, and the repeatabilities of the analysis results were 1.12-17.41%. This method has been successfully applied to estimating PCBs and PBDEs in milk samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available