4.5 Article

Improved solvent collection system for a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of organochlorine pesticides from water using low-density organic solvent

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 837-843

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000728

Keywords

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Gas chromatography; Organochlorine pesticides; Water sample analysis

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 96-2113-M-007-03-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) levels in lake and tap water samples were determined by a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method using a low-density organic solvent and an improved solvent collection system (DLLME-ISCS). This method used a very small volume of a solvent of low toxicity (11 mu L of 1-nonanol and 400 mu L of methanol) to extract OCPs from 10 mL water samples prior to the analysis by GC. After centrifugation in the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, there was a liquid organic drop floating between the water surface and the glass wall of the centrifuge tube. The liquid organic drop (with some water phase) was transferred into a microtube (3mm x 15 mm) with a syringe. The organic and aqueous phases were separated in the microtube immediately. Then, 1 mu L of the organic solvent (which was in the upper portion of liquid in the microtube) was easily collected by a syringe and injected into the GC-ECD system for the analysis. Under optimum conditions, the linear range of this method was 5-5000 ng/L for most of the analytes. The correlation coefficient was higher than 0.997. Enrichment factors ranged from 1309 to 3629. The relative recoveries ranged from 73 to 119% for lake water samples. The LODs of the method ranged from 0.7 to 9.4 ng/L. The precision of the method ranged from 1.0 to 10.8% for lake water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available