4.5 Article

Development and optimization of the SPE procedure for determination of pharmaceuticals in water samples by HPLC-diode array detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 258-267

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200900571

Keywords

HPLC-diode array detection; Membrane treatment; Pharmaceuticals; Production wastewater; SPE cartridges

Funding

  1. Unity Through Knowledge Fund (UKF)
  2. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports [125-1253008-1350, 125-1253008-3009, 125-2120898-3148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the investigation of different types of SPE sorbents for the preconcentration of eight veterinary pharmaceuticals from water samples. The pharmaceuticals studied were sulfamethazine, sulfadiazine, sulfaguanidine, trimethoprim, oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin, norfloxacin and penicillin G/procaine. Five different SPE materials (Strata-X, Strata-X-C, Strata SDB-L, Strata C8 and Strata C18) from Phenomenex were compared with Oasis HLB with a view to obtaining the best cartridges for all pharmaceuticals investigated. Extraction efficiency was determined by HPLC with diode array detection (DAD). HPLC-DAD separation and quantification of the selected pharmaceuticals were carried out under gradient elution by a binary mixture of 0.01 M oxalic acid and ACN based on cyano modified column (LiChrosphere 100 CN) from Merck. Strata-X provided the best results in the preconcentration of 100 mL water samples, yielding average pharmaceutical recoveries of higher than 90%, except for sulfaguanidine (76.1%). The developed Strata-X-HLPC-DAD method was validated and applied, for the efficient investigation of reverse osmosis/nanofiltration membranes and for the removal of these eight pharmaceuticals from the production wastewater samples. NF90 and XLE membranes were shown to be the best for the rejection of all investigated pharmaceuticals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available